<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Edurati Review &#187; K12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eduratireview.com/tag/k12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eduratireview.com</link>
	<description>Where Education Policy Meets Pedagogy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oral Argument Recap &#8211; Forrest Grove v. T.A.</title>
		<link>http://eduratireview.com/2009/04/oral-argument-recap-forrest-grove-v-ta-html/</link>
		<comments>http://eduratireview.com/2009/04/oral-argument-recap-forrest-grove-v-ta-html/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brianjford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brian Jason Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eduratireview.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Brian Jason Ford, Esq. I am digesting the argument transcript from today&#8217;s oral argument before the Supreme Court in Forrest Grove v. T.A., a special education case about private school tuition reimbursement. I will provide a thorough overview of the Court&#8217;s decision when it is released, but the argument itself is noteworthy (and not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eduratireview.com/2009/04/oral-argument-recap-forrest-grove-v-ta-html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strip Search Argument Highlights</title>
		<link>http://eduratireview.com/2009/04/strip-search-argument-highlights-html/</link>
		<comments>http://eduratireview.com/2009/04/strip-search-argument-highlights-html/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brianjford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brian Jason Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K12]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eduratireview.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve pulled out some gems from the oral argument in Stafford Unified School District v. Redding, the student strip search case now pending in the Supreme Court. Even non-attorneys may enjoy this. Read on for a discussion about what kids do with permanent markers, the “ick factor” of “crotching” drugs and, maybe, an over-share from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eduratireview.com/2009/04/strip-search-argument-highlights-html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

