Archive for the ‘William Sterrett’ category

The Web Will Never Be in “Full Blooms” Without Us

August 14th, 2010

Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates set the Twitter world abuzz with his comments last weekend at the Techonomy Conference in Lake Tahoe.  Gates’ remarks on the changing scope of education soon made headlines that “in five years, the best education will come from the web.”  While he qualified his remarks by strongly advocating for K-12 education and the work that schools are doing, discussion soon ensued on blogs and social media sites regarding the important role that living educators play.

Gates is right, however, in this regard: schools and universities do need to adjust to the realities of access and demand.  There must be increased access, by use of technology, to meet the growing demand for a global education. Of course, it should also be emphasized that only people- with expertise, knowledge, relationships, and wisdom- can deliver the goods and empower the next generation.

Much of this should be looked at through the lens of Benjamin Bloom, who in the 1950’s advocated for engaging students in “higher order” learning (Creating, Evaluating, and Synthesizing) rather than lower level “recall” learning (Knowledge and Comprehension).  And though this recent conversation was never truly a “Man vs. Computer” debate, we should continue to emphasize the vital role that we can play, that we should play, to engage students while using the latest innovative tools and strategies.  Only humans are capable of pushing each other to higher Bloom’s learning. Yet, the advent of technology makes this effort more possible then ever before, and we must capitalize on this growth explosion as educators in order to stay relevant and accessible.  Recently, a UVa Professor who works with STEM Ph.D. students noted that the newest versions, learned content and innovations are quickly outdated; thus there is a need for today’s students to “possess competence and the ability to innovate” in order to adapt and succeed in a changing world.  Technology, collaboration, and innovation must be intertwined and the educator is the catalyst in infusing those variables for effective student outcomes.

I have been fortunate to work for and with people and institutions that value technology.  As a middle school science teacher, I was able to use interactive websites to highlight updated satellite images of the moons of Jupiter miles away, or explain the intricate bonds of molecules in a tangible manner- unthought-of of when I was learning science from textbooks as a youngster.  Later, as a principal, I was able to highlight great instructional practices from colleagues by use of a Flip Camera in faculty meetings, showcasing 30-second clips of effective teaching throughout the building. We were able to instantly e-mail teachers feedback on lessons with a handheld PDA seconds after observing their math class.  And we were able to quickly alert the entire school community through a web-based communications system in rare, unforeseen times of crisis even though I might be out of state on a weekend trip.  Now, as a professor of education, I can engage students in a rigorous course on evaluation despite not working within the same zip code or even during the same time.  By carefully crafting a course to meet the needs of the learner and maintaining rigorous alignment with the objectives of the course, I can maintain a robust, diverse roster and also effectively recognize the fact that many of my students are juggling teaching jobs, family commitments and other time constraints, and yet empower them to be leaders in their schools and communities in this 21st century.

However, as educators, we have to take the initiative in each of these cases to make the web work for us… and for the students.  We continually must have the support of our schools, our leaders, and our colleagues.  And we have to synthesize information, evaluate its relevance, and create effective lessons that are relevant. And then we are able to move beyond “low Bloom’s” learning by seizing upon technological advances.  I would not have been as effective a teacher without the web, but the web wouldn’t have reached the students… without me.

Gates is right.  The web will reach the students in greater ways than ever before.  And we must realize that the web user- the student- is of utmost importance, and how we reach and engage that student is up to us as educators.  Computers and the web will not alone enable students to reach “full Blooms” without expert educators emphasizing engaging students… whomever and wherever they are.

William Sterrett is an Assistant Professor of Educational Leadership at the University of North Carolina Wilmington.  He can be reached at sterrettw@uncw.edu

The views expressed are the author’s and do not represent any institution or organization.

Accountability that Works

August 1st, 2009

Accountability that Works . . . .for Kids.

William L. Sterrett, Ph.D. (@billsterrett)

Many issues of importance, from the economy and health care, to foreign relations and energy can occupy any president early in his term. These issues certainly are at the forefront today. Similarly, in education, we are at a pivotal moment in history. President Barack Obama and his administration, along with Congress and state/ local government leaders, and, importantly, educational leaders, have the opportunity to truly make a difference in how we view accountability for kids and for educators. Though educational leaders, policy wonks, and political commentators offer a boilerplate menu of educational “to do” items such as universal pre-school, salaries, fully funding No Child Left Behind, and a host of other items for much-needed discussion and debate, perhaps the most “fixable” item that the new president’s team can address with little to no cost is the accountability issue. Central to the NCLB act is the basic question: “How can we ensure that each child is making adequate yearly progress?”

As lawmakers scurried to frame that basic question in terms of measurable accountability, wide variances in testing methods (and pass rates) ranged from state to state. As a result we as educators have difficulty framing “best practices” in terms of state-to-state comparisons. Assessments that are built upon one state’s curriculum framework can look much different from other states. Similarly, even within states, within divisions, and within school districts, there is wide variance as schools may vary widely in regards to student populations.

Yes, realistic consideration must be given as schools even within the same division may have a very different make-up in terms of socioeconomics, ethnicity, and languages spoken. No Child Left Behind looks at these distinctions in terms of membership groups- it is time to instead look at these in terms of growth opportunities. At our Distinguished Title I School, the staff enthusiastically welcomes and embraces our diverse population (no one ethnicity is above 50% and nearly half of all students qualify for free/reduced lunch).

However, under the current provisions of NCLB, our membership groups must score a “pass” on an end-of-year test that currently does not take into consideration that a 3rd grade student who comes to us reading at a kindergarten level and makes an extraordinary two years of growth in a year is a huge success- he will simply get a “fail” score on an end-of-year exam. Similarly, a 3rd grade student that is reading on a 5th grade level only has to pass the 3rd grade assessment; we should instead be pushing her to excel even further. Our schools should be pushed to push all students to new heights. Educators want to be held to a high standard, and we want to be judged fairly and realistically. Here are five essential recommendations to enable this solution:

1.) Adopt a Baseline of National Standards- Other countries have “power standards” that are concise and to-the-point. Let states build upon these but use these standards as a baseline criterion for testing. We should applaud the recent efforts of the National Governor’s Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State Officers (CCSO) for their efforts in this regard so far.

2.) Measure Growth- “Value-added” models that take into consideration inputs (where students come in) and outputs (where the school community has taken them throughout the course of the school year) are needed. Growth should be measured on the above power-standards in a way that does not force teachers to spend inordinate amounts of time testing rather than teaching. This will bolster instruction, collaboration, reliability and validity.

3.) Higher-order Teaching and Assessments- It’s time to not rely solely upon “bubble tests” to measure accountability but let’s find ways to push students to create, design, synthesize, and evaluate.

4.) Reward Staff in Challenging Schools- Retaining teachers and staff in high-poverty schools is a challenge that can be addressed by supplementing compensation accordingly. All students deserve a great teacher; we should create incentives for our teachers to work in challenging environments and to share out their success stories.

5.) Look at the Big Picture- A holistic determination of a school community demonstrating healthy growth and progress versus the current complicated and potentially punitive system will take into account the bigger picture of the above growth model while also recognizing the larger picture of growing the school community in terms of safety, communication, and collaboration. Principals and teachers alike would welcome this realistic portrayal and it would encourage greater teamwork and transparency.

Like all professions, educators should be held to a high standard that is realistic and fair. Today’s myriad national issues are rightfully drawing a lot of attention in D.C. However, scores of schools will soon enter numerous sanctions that drain already-depleted budgets simply because the current accountability structures fail to take into consideration inputs and outputs. Today’s leaders should consider a true “quick fix” for today’s schools that will have little or no cost involved, yet transform what is considered by many to be a punitive “high stakes” model into a true growth model. Yes, the stakes are indeed high- we must ensure that each student, regardless of skin color, socioeconomics, language, or current achievement level, is truly being challenged to excel in this “flat,” increasingly competitive world. We must employ an accountability system that works. . . .for schools and for kids.

Author Biography:

Dr. William Sterrett is an elementary principal with Albemarle County Public Schools, in Charlottesville, Virginia. A former upper elementary science and reading teacher, he is current principal of a 2009 Distinguished Title I School which also received the 2009 Governor’s Board of Education Virginia Index of Performance (VIP) Award. He received his B.S. in education from Asbury College and his Ph.D. from the University of Virginia.

Please note that this piece is from me as a citizen, parent, and educator; I write independently and not on behalf of my school, division, or any other organization.

http://www.corestandards.org/ (for more information about NGA, CCSO)

Switch to our mobile site