<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Edurati Review &#187; SCOTUS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eduratireview.com/category/scotus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eduratireview.com</link>
	<description>Where Education Policy Meets Pedagogy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis of Forest Grove v. T.A</title>
		<link>http://eduratireview.com/2009/06/analysis-of-forrest-grove-v-ta-html/</link>
		<comments>http://eduratireview.com/2009/06/analysis-of-forrest-grove-v-ta-html/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brianjford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brian Jason Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuition Reimbursement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eduratireview.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Brian Jason Ford, Esq., Legal Editor This post first appeared as a special edition of the DBYD Difference, the education law newsletter of Dischell, Bartle, Yanoff &#38; Dooley, P.C. It’s just a little bit of history repeated… Analysis of Forest Grove v. T.A. – SCOTUS’s latest take on the IDEA A special edition of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eduratireview.com/2009/06/analysis-of-forrest-grove-v-ta-html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

